Al Fin del Mundo

Entries tagged as ‘Travel’

My Separate Life

Saturday September 13, 2008 · 4 Comments

It is 6pm Saturday afternoon, San Francisco standard time, seventy-five degrees, sun just beginning to set behind the hills, city trading day life for night.

.

My brother begins college in Atlanta next week, and my sister will study abroad in Spain this spring. My father’s parents will drive cross-country again this summer for another set of graduations, even though my grandfather broke his collarbone driving on Minnesota ice last winter. My mother’s father has been gone almost ten years, and I don’t think we spoke on the phone even once, the year he died.

We live very separate lives.

.

My father once told me that while he envies me the San Francisco sun, he doesn’t think he and my mother will ever move out west. Once you put roots down, he said, it’s hard to move. Your community becomes more important than anything else. It takes care of you, it gives you context, it makes you happier than anything else.

This seems obvious, but at 25, I still can’t see myself staying in one place for long. I get itchy feet. I get tired of speaking only English. Once I know a place, I start wanting to meet another. For me, the novel has always trumped the known.

But the more people I meet, and the more places I know, the more unhealthy this nomadic lifestyle seems, as a cultural theme – even if it is a central tenet of US culture. We go away to college, and meet and make new friends – then start a job and do it all again. We change cities and friends when we change jobs, when we change careers, when it suits us, when we have to. We keep up with perhaps one in ten or fifty of the people we know well from each phase of our lives.

It seems we only find community through our children; family life forces us to ’settle down,’ to participate in the PTA, become soccer and scouting parents, grow away from distant friends with time. Children pull us together as a community in the US (“it takes a village”) and childhood is the time when individuals are most plugged into a community – until we have our own children, and unless our parents continued moving when we were young.

No surprise, then, that childhood and youth are idealized in the US; like it or not, that kind of closeness matters to us, as human beings. More than money, more than achievement, more than anything else – we need intimate, subtle, long-lasting relationships in our lives, and not (only) romantic relationships; we need the give-and-take of long-term friendships, the annoyances that come with keeping up with the Joneses (or being the Joneses), the comfort of knowing our place in a community, advice and sympathy from people who’ve seen our lives evolve. We’re tribal by nature (just think about the way your office is organized…), and we need desperately to belong to some group, somewhere.

.

So we need community, but in order to have it, we must give up advancement – or experiences – that we might otherwise obtain. So we promise ourselves we’ll get back to community, or we create it as we go along.

I think TV fills in, for some; if you watch Colbert often enough, he’ll start to seem real, a friend. The internet lets you can connect across time zones, country boundaries, whatever. But it’s still not enough. Working from home doesn’t replace a physical office, phone sex does no justice to the real thing, and virtual relationships are just that.

Although they can help.

.

San Francisco is a city of nomads, digital and otherwise. Most of the people I know now will be gone in a few years, if I don’t leave first, myself. Nearly everyone I know acts within fluid groups of friends. We shift in and out of each others’ lives with barely a ripple. We stand in for the friends we’ve had in highschool and in college, we stand in for family, we create context, even if that context has no depth, no background.

We seek meaning in activities, in our careers, in our romantic relationships.

And perhaps there’s nothing wrong with that. All I know is that I’m coming to believe roots matter, even if we don’t like it much – coming to believe healthy people are part of healthy communities, and that those communities are almost impossible to maintain if we keep changing location. And that the opportunities and experiences we want most are almost impossible to attain if we don’t.

.

I don’t know what the answer is; I don’t know if there is one. Use your technology to maintain your community! sounds great, but I can only call my sisters so many times a week; it’s not the same as cooking dinner together on a Friday night. And phone time takes away from the real, the now.

My siblings and I want to live in the same city some day; it’s a plan, the best we’ve come up with so far. Now all we have to do is pick a city to grow roots in. I hope it will be somewhere with long, slow sunsets…

Categories: My Life · San Francisco · Sociology · Technology · United States
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , ,

I bought a 1-way ticket to San Francisco

Monday January 7, 2008 · Leave a Comment

I want to see if

(a) i get searched, and

(b) this puts me on a terrorist watch list (i.e. they search me every time i go through security now).

Also, on my NYC trip this weekend, I took a razor blade through incoming security in both my local airport and JFK.

Categories: Travel · United States
Tagged: , , ,

Your Shampoo Will Kill Someone

Monday January 7, 2008 · Leave a Comment

NYT Blog Post: “The Airport Security Follies”
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/opinion/index.html

consider for a moment the hypocrisy of T.S.A.’s confiscation policy. At every concourse checkpoint you’ll see a bin or barrel brimming with contraband containers taken from passengers for having exceeded the volume limit. Now, the assumption has to be that the materials in those containers are potentially hazardous. If not, why were they seized in the first place? But if so, why are they dumped unceremoniously into the trash? They are not quarantined or handed over to the bomb squad; they are simply thrown away. The agency seems to be saying that it knows these things are harmless. But it’s going to steal them anyway, and either you accept it or you don’t fly.

The rest is equally worth reading.

Categories: Right Brain File (RBF) · Travel
Tagged: , , , ,

Torture and objectivity

Monday December 17, 2007 · Leave a Comment

This is from the FBI’s website, witness accounts of detainees being tortured.

Guantanamo Bay Inquiry

A survey of 493 FBI personnel who were asked whether they observed aggressive mistreatment, interrogations or interview techniques of GTMO yielded 26 positive responses and several additional responses that were “not purely negative.”

Here’s one of the ‘positive’ ones:

W(itness) observed women crying near the river, their homes had been destroyed by planes. Trucks full of people trying to surrender were blown up by planes. On 2d day after capture, d(etainee) was put in a ditch by Northern Alliance people. Next day, he was allowed to jump into a truck and taken to Mazar-e-Sharif where he was forced into a metal “shipping”-type container w/about 100 men. The container was then closed and d blacked out due to lack of air. When he awoke, there were new holes in the container., The man next to him was dead. He thinks he was in the container 24 hours – only 20 men survived. When it opened he was at Sabergaan jail. The dead were put into a hole and buried, he heard that those too weak to get out of the container were as well. US soldiers arrived about a month later

I repeat: this is from the FBI’s website. It’s been released under the Freedom of Information Act. Here’s another:

on several occasions, witness (“W”) saw detainees (“ds”) in interrogation rooms chained hand and foot in fetal position to floor w/no chair/ food/water; most urinated or defecated on selves, and were left there 18, 24 hrs or more. Once, the air conditioning was so low that the barefoot d was shaking with cold. Another time, it was off so the unventilated room was over 100 degrees, d was almost unconscious on floor with a pile of hair next to him (he had apparently been pulling it out throughout the night). Another time, it was sweltering hot and loud rap music played – d’s hand and foot was chanined and he was in a fetal position on the floor. Upon inquiry, W was told that interrogators [military contractors] ordered this treatment. Took place in Delta Camp.

So those accounts have been told to the FBI and are under investigation; I can imagine one or two people giving a false account to the FBI for the shock value of it, but not 30+ military personnel, many/most of whom would certainly lose their careers – and possibly freedom – if it turns out they’re lying.

If you want to be (more) shocked, and along the same lines, read this article, posted on Salon, a San Francisc-based news source about which I know nothing whatsoever, except that they carry interesting articles. This one is (purportedly) by a Yemeni man who was held and tortured by the US for two years.

All of this, naturally, brings me to political philosophy.

The hardest thing to attain in life is objectivity; to see yourself, others, the world itself, without bias. This is as true for nations (and states) as it is for people. Perhaps objectivity is an impossible goal – but I’ve spent enough time outside of the U.S. now to say that the view from the outside frightens me

  • Allegations of institutionalized, government-sanctioned torture all over the world.
  • Unnumbered and hugely destructive nuclear weapons – more than most of the rest of the worlds’ combined – in the hands of an incredibly flexible, lethal army/navy/air force, with trigger-happy generals and Presidents at the helm.
  • An intelligence community so advanced it can spy on its own citizens without disturbing either their consciences or daily lives.
  • Surly airline security that repels and humiliates instead of inviting.
    (see this Salon article – an entertaining read, at least! – or my own thoughts on airline security/hysteria here).
  • A ‘closed’ border so porous we’re enacting punitive immigration laws.
  • Most US citizens – by far – don’t even have a passport. Those who do, likely have never been anywhere other then Canada or Mexico.
  • Most don’t speak a second language, but if they do, it’s most likely to be Spanish, and they speak it at home.
  • The highest murder rate – by far – among other industrial and first world nations, and one of the worst school age reading and math skill sets among that same group.
  • Capable of holding an international grudge – and the world’s longest-running embargo (against Cuba) – for over 40 years.
  • An upper class whose top 1%’s increase in income from 2003-5 was more than the total income of the poorest 20% – most of whom are black or Hispanic.

The increase in incomes of the top 1 percent of Americans from 2003 to 2005 exceeded the total income of the poorest 20 percent of Americans, data in a new report by the Congressional Budget Office shows.
The poorest fifth of households had total income of $383.4 billion in 2005, while just the increase in income for the top 1 percent came to $524.8 billion, a figure 37 percent higher.

Report Says That the Rich Are Getting Richer Faster, Much Faster,”
NYT 12/17/2007

… shall I go on?

I’m not denigrating the United States here, merely pointing out that the view from the outside is quite different from that on the in. Every story has another side. The United States, like India, is a nation state where any statement you make about it will be both true and false.

Can we fix this? I don’t know. We’ve been running on massive deficits since WWII, and on a wartime economy since WWI. We are a nation of spenders – up to and far beyond our means. We eat, we drink, we enjoy life at home – and, hemmed in by oceans on either side, and by neighbors who have no reason for aggression – we feel (mostly) safe.

Most Estadonidenses (am I spelling that right, M?) are like people anywhere; they (we?, heh) simply want to have a home and community, to find a partner, raise our children safely, eat good food, enjoy life.

Somewhere along the way, I think we’ve gotten lost; we’ve forgotten that no one can have it all, no country, no person, no government.

  • We cannot be the masters of war, the world’s arms dealer, the military innovators and be loved and respected as a peaceful, peace-making, mature nation.
  • We cannot act like “ugly Americans” while in Paris, and expect to be welcomed with open arms at the European summit.
  • We cannot refuse to deal with China – or, for that matter, with the rational Middle East – on realistic and equal terms and expect to be able to control the outcome of all action in the region.
  • We cannot refuse to buy oil in Africa – on whatever grounds, be they morally correct or not – and then expect to have African oil when our Middle East wells run dry.
  • We cannot torture criminals – of any stripe – and be regarded as purveyors of justice.
  • We cannot ignore history if we wish to survive the present.

That is the bottom line, I suppose. When we say one thing and do another, we must eventually explain ourselves.
So how do we fix it?

I expect that eventually, we’ll have to face a choice – as the USSR did, just before the breakup of the Soviet Union in 1989. To let the outside states go, and sacrifice the heart, or to keep the heart of the nation, but let the empire crumble to pieces? In 1989, Gorbachev let the satellite states go, and, unable to fund both guns and plowshares, turned to inward economic development. Today, under Putin, Russia is emerging, a lean, confident Phoenix, triumphant from the ashes of her past.

Could we do the same? Could we let the empire go, withdraw from our bases, allow the rest of the world to muddle about as it did before we came on the scene? Could we take 50 years to revitalize our economy? Could we reinvent, reformat, reenergize, re-Constitutionalize (sorry) ourselves?

Do We, The People, have it in us any more?

Have we become too .. soft, too sedentary to take on the task of first, seeing ourselves, and second, affecting change in our own lives and backyards?

I’m no political analyst, and I don’t know shit about economics, but I do know we’re overextended in every way imaginable. If we don’t pull back soon, well .. something’s got to give.

Categories: Philosophy · Politics · Terrorism · Travel · US Policy · United States · War
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , ,

More from Istanbul

Thursday December 13, 2007 · Leave a Comment

What I got trying to access wordpress.com from Istanbul…

Bu siteye erişim mahkeme

kararıyla engellenmiştir.

Access to this site has been suspended with decision of Court.

And when trying to access lningram.wordpress.com (this site specifically):

Bu siteye erişim mahkeme kararıyla engellenmiştir.

T.C. Fatih 2.Asliye Hukuk

Mahkemesi 2007/195 Nolu Kararı

gereği bu siteye erişim

engellenmiştir.

Access to this site has been suspended in accordance with decision no: 2007/195 of T.C. Fatih 2.Civil Court of First Instance.

… pretty interesting, no?

Categories: Blog Notes · Technology · Travel
Tagged: , , , , ,

Istanbul

Tuesday December 4, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Soooo… I thought I’d post Istanbul pictures. (If you’re not sure where Istanbul is, go here to find out…)

Istanbul Street

So this is Sultanahmet, the old city. I loved the cobblestone streets. The hotel was about three blocks from here.

Down the street a little (to the right of picture 1; if you keep going down the sidewalk, you come to the Hagia Sophia and the Blue Mosque..):

sistanbul-010.jpg

David took this picture, and I really really like it; this is the Blue Mosque, seen through the trees on a cloudy day …

sistanbul-012.jpg

The Blue Mosque, from just inside the courtyard:

sistanbul-014.jpg

Wiki notes that the Sultan Ahmed Mosque (named after said Sultan, and a.k.a. the Blue Mosque) was built between 1609 and 1616, and that it stands as the “culmination of two centuries of Ottoman mosque development. It is,” (we are also told), “the last great mosque of the classical period.” There’s more links, if you care to go on :)

This shot (the Hagia Sophia behind us, Blue Mosque in front) really contains a great deal of Sultanahmet (the old city) as it stands today …

sistanbul-020.jpg

Hagia Sophia in the rain. I love doorways, windows, rainy days …

sistanbul-017.jpg

Beautiful, no?

Categories: Europe · Images · Middle East · Travel
Tagged: , , , ,

The Author has gone to Istanbul

Monday November 12, 2007 · Leave a Comment

I am leaving Wednesday, November 14th, and will return on the 20th.

DJ Tiesto is playing in Istanbul on Friday.

In the meantime, I’ve a couple other posts in the works. I’ll try and add one more before leave :) … Wish me luck :)

Categories: Music · My Life · Travel
Tagged: , , , , ,

… and found wanting …

Friday October 12, 2007 · 1 Comment

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

– Ben Franklin

This New York Times op-ed is making the blog and response rounds. The backstory behind the op-ed: an alcoholic mother publicly and violently lost her temper (is screaming and throwing your blackberry ‘violent’?) in the middle of the airport when she found her seat had been given away. She was cuffed and booked by airport officials – and then (get this) died in custody due to some weird condition nobody (her included) bothered telling the police about. The op-ed goes on in typical “bleeding-heart fashion” (yes, thank you, Dave :) about how we’re just missing our social agape these days, and if someone – anyone!! – had just put an arm around the poor woman, she’d still be alive

gag me, please. All of us have had our bags searched, our underwear laughed at, our reading material scanned, our personal items touched by complete strangers. The rest of us have put up with worse indignities, without losing our tempers… Right?

.

.

That’s what I want to talk about here, not this article specifically. Sure, the woman was an unstable alcoholic. Sure, she died. But what happened to her has certainly happened to the rest of us.

Three months ago, I went through Miami security on my way home from South America. In my bag I had (among other things) a little stone fertility god – penis included – and a couple jars of a carmel-like Argentine sweet called dulce de leche. I had to strip down to pants, a tshirt and socks to get through the scanner, and then these two security guys – probably my age, 23, 25, something – went through everything I had with me. They pulled the sweets out and nixed them instantly, and then took out the god and started laughing. And I laughed with them. Wanna know why? – because I didn’t want them to take it away from me. I was fucking pissed – my stuff, my sweets, a present for my grandmother! – but I didn’t want them to toss the rock, too. They had all the power, and I was standing there in my socks with a lot of good memories associated with that particular piece of marble.
And so I teased them back, said a few sexy/racy things. Almost got the dulce back, too. Walked away thinking, “at least they didn’t declare the god contraband or something…”

… So what the hell, people?!?!

Satiated people have nothing to gain and everything to lose, and let’s face it; we are satiated here, on everything – goods, services, privileges, media, news (but not ideas or ideals). Who wants to argue over a fat, greasy finger in with their lacy thongs when they might get on a terrorist watch list over the issue?

.

We bend (over) to fit the circumstances.

… I think we have to face something as a nation: Freedom and safety – like, perhaps, freedom and equality – are diametrically opposed values. They’re opposites.

.

.

Give this a think:

  • If everyone’s free to do what they want, some will do better or worse than others, and there’s no equality.
  • If we enforce equality, most people aren’t free to do what they want.
  • Ditto with safety; for perfect safety, we all need to be audited by the IRS at least once a year, allow our every communication to be monitored, provide biometric information to the government and wear tiny electronic radios to show our every movement.

We’d get all the terrorists that way, for sure, and all the prostitutes and their pimps and their clients, and all the illegal immigrants, and the people who watch kiddie porn or cheat on their spouses, the murderers, the drug abusers, the people who cheat on their income taxes, the people who drive too fast on the highway. We’d get all the bad guys.

No problem, right? I mean, if I’m not doing anything wrong, how could it hurt? Only a bad citizen doesn’t want their wires tapped!

Social networks have historically existed both in the matrix and the interstices of law and government; we all go to church on Sunday, but then I take food to the neighbor’s kid who got herself knocked up. I don’t rat on my cube-mate when s/he comes in late to work, and then I expect him or her to stay mum when I leave at 4:30, five minutes after the boss. I take an extra cup of coffee without putting in my dollar, but I pay an extravagant sum to the neighbor’s kid who’s fundrasing for the soccer team – and, perhaps, by the way, her dad brings coffee to the office. Perhaps I drive too fast, but I mow my neighbor’s lawn. We all need to feel we’re gaming the system, just a little, and sometimes we all need to feel we’re making it better, but off the record.

.

.

Which brings me to this:

  • Freedom lies in our ability to self-regulate – both socially and personally.
  • Law exists to prevent willful and gross manipulation of the system. (whether that’s war, murder, theft, whatever –).
  • Law (and government, for that matter) should provide outside stability so we can participate in social networking and regulation.
  • Law does not exist to provide recompense for stress, accidents, or spilled coffee.

We cannot and will never be both perfectly free and perfectly safe.

.

.

Back to my sexy-jokes interlude with the guys at the airport: The U.S. government has decided it can divest itself of care for our dignity and privacy in the interest of our safety and security.

I – personally, and I bet you too – have decided I am willing to collude with “a certain amount” of humiliation and non-privacy, so I can keep my stuff and catch my flights.

I care more about my stuff than my dignity.

.

.

Do I deserve my freedom? Do you?

Categories: More On This Later · Sex · Travel · US Policy
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

My Wandering Ways: Explained?

Wednesday October 10, 2007 · 1 Comment

Writes David Brooks in “The Odyssey Years,” an op-ed for the NYT (yes, I know, a lot of NYT posts, sorry! different next time..)

There used to be four common life phases: childhood, adolescence, adulthood and old age. Now, there are at least six: childhood, adolescence, odyssey, adulthood, active retirement and old age. Of the new ones, the least understood is odyssey, the decade of wandering that frequently occurs between adolescence and adulthood…

I’d been feeling I was alone in this lifestyle thing; I have a part-time job (30 hours that’s really closer to 50) and I’ve moved six times in the last eleven months – twice intracontinentally – seems every time I have money, I have to spend it on something (blasted insurance, school payments, new shoes…) and then I’m back at square 1 again.

I’d like to be gainfully employed, at something beyond the poverty line, believe you me! And on top of that, for whatever reason, I seem to have the time, space, and freedom (and, yes, the parental “you can live at home for a while”) to look for something I truly enjoy, something I can stick with for a while, really get into, get good at. Something challenging!

I met a lot of people in Peru (I’ll update and post some pictures soon) who were odysseying ; a couple girls from the UK and a couple from Ireland, a guy from the UK with this amazing non-profits job, and on and on and on – basically people who’ve decided that they (we?) don’t have to worry about the typical 4-years, job, kids, retire thing; perhaps we’ll take a little time, things’ll come out alright in the end, who knows?

I’d been really worried about ambition, about changing the world, for a long time; just struck me the other day – either I will or I won’t get to run an NGO someday, I will or I won’t be able to do a lot of interesting business/policy connection/papers/graphs, I will or I won’t – and I trust myself, if I don’t, it’ll be because I’ve found something better.

Bring on the odyssey : )

Categories: Philosophy · Psychology · Travel
Tagged: , , , ,

Re: Gone until February 5

Friday January 26, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Hi all.

Tomorrow, at 5pm, I’m getting on a bus (“colectivo”) and heading to Patagonia for ten days with a few other people from the program. I’ll be back sometime Monday the 5th of February and hopefully will post again either the 5th or the 6th.

Until then, stay warm in the frigid north!

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: ,